top of page

Don’t Skip the Retro—Your Product Quad Has Work to Do

Most launch retrospectives are either skipped or sanitized into team therapy. But if you’re working with a Product Quad—product manager, engineering lead, UX designer, and product marketing manager—you’re sitting on a goldmine of insight. Each role brings a different lens to what really happened, from internal trade-offs to market impact. A proper Quad retro uncovers what worked, what didn’t, and how to do it better next time. Skip the confetti and start having better conversations.

 

Most product teams treat launch retros as optional. If the feature shipped and nothing exploded, the retro becomes a 15-minute Zoom that could’ve been a Slack emoji. Or worse—it's canceled entirely, replaced with a group “well done” and a sprint to the next fire.


But if you’re working with a Product Quad—product manager, engineering lead, UX designer, and product marketing manager—you’ve got the perfect setup to run a retro that actually tells you something useful.

Because let’s be honest: your Jira board won’t tell you what really happened. Your KPIs might lie. And no single person has the full picture.

But together? The Quad sees everything. If you let them.


The Four Truths of a Launch

Each role in the Quad brings a different lens:

  • Product Manager: Did we solve the right problem? Did it move the metric we cared about—or just ship on time?

  • Tech Lead: What corners did we cut? What exploded quietly in the background? What should we never do again?

  • UX Designer: Where are users confused, frustrated, or flat-out ignoring the thing we built?

  • Product Marketing Manager: Did the market care? Did we enable Sales? Did anyone get it?


Without all four in the room, you’re doing a partial autopsy on a body you’ve already buried.


What the Retro Is (and Isn’t)

This isn’t a feel-good team celebration. Do that too, but separately.

This is a debrief. Think of it like a post-flight checklist for a crew that landed with one engine out and half the passengers asleep.

It’s also not a witch hunt. You’re not here to assign blame. You’re here to figure out:

  • What actually happened?

  • What did we assume that turned out to be false?

  • What did we miss, and how do we make sure it doesn’t happen again?



Questions to Ask in a Real Quad Retro

Here’s a simple framework. Give each role 5–10 minutes to answer:

  • PM: What did we plan? What changed? What trade-offs did we make? Were the outcomes worth it?

  • Tech: Where did we get surprised? Where did the estimates go sideways? What tech debt did we knowingly accept?

  • UX: What did we learn about the users? Were they who we thought they were? Where are they stumbling?

  • PMM: How did the launch land in the market? What feedback did Sales bring? Did our messaging hit or miss?


Don’t wait for a postmortem after something fails. That’s too late. Every launch leaves a trail—some of it gold, some of it wreckage.


A regular retro with your Quad is how you stop repeating mistakes and start building institutional memory. Otherwise, you’re just winging it—over and over again.


Facing another launch? Check out Product Launch Success and never struggle with another launch again.



 
 
bottom of page